McSpadden v. Big Ben Coal Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that the appellant’s brief was so indefinite as to preclude the court’s consideration
• noting party failed to give supportive authority for general allegations of error and concluding party’s “argument is so indefinite as to preclude our consideration”
• noting party failed to give supportive authority for general allegations of error and concluding party’s “argument is so indefinite as to preclude our consideration”
• noting party failed to give supportive authority for general allegations of error and concluding party’s “argument is so indefinite as to preclude our consideration”
• “[Tjhere is no reason to conclude that ... the legislature intended to permit employer furnished medical examinations merely to aid the claimant’s discovery.”
• legislature removed restrictions in section 85A.8 and eliminated section 85A.9 schedule not to narrow the definition of occupational diseases but broaden it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).