Skip to main content
· 12/20/2004

McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.

Citations

  • 349 F. Supp. 2d 1
  • 2004 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25516
  • 2004 WL 2943233

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that plaintiffs could not establish that reliance on “vague and indefinite” promise was reasonable for purposes of promissory estoppel claim
  • noting usefulness of regression analyses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Huvelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.