McReynolds v. Elston

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “it is the character and function of an order that determine its classification” for determining jurisdiction over an interlocutory order
• reasoning that whether a claim falls within the scope of an arbitration agreement involves the trial court’s legal interpretation of the agreement, and we review such legal interpretations de novo
• finding jurisdiction because “although the trial court's order allowed the AAA Arbitration to continue, it denied McReynolds's potential contractual right to arbitration under the Settlement Agreement”
• describing the test under the FAA and TAA as the same
• “Whether an arbitration agreement is enforceable is subject to de novo review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).