Mcreynolds v. Alabama Department of Youth Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the removal language in § 1452(f)(3) is nearly identical to that in the FSLIC’s and the FDIC’s removal provisions” and finding “support for the argument that Congress intended each of these corporations to have ready access to the federal courts”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).