McRaven v. Dameron

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a recorded phone call was properly admitted under the former version of OCGA § 24-6-621 to contradict the witness’s testimony that no one from the State had called her
• holding that it was highly probable that allowing summary of cellular telephone records to go out with jury during deliberations did not contribute to verdict where underlying records were admitted into evidence by stipulation
• criminal history of family members is sufficiently race-neutral reason to exercise peremptory strike
• criminal history of family members is sufficiently race-neutral reason to exercise peremptory strike
• applying OCGA § 17-16- 6
• applying OCGA § 17-16- 6

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).