McRae v. United States Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ATF properly withheld “the names of and identifying information about federal and state law enforcement agents and third parties whose names appear in the responsive records”
• concluding that ATF’s search of TECS and N-Force were adequately conducted
• concluding that the 2005 Rider qualified as Exemption 3 statute
• “finding adequate the ATF’s search of TECS and N-Force in order to respond to the plaintiffs FOIA request”
• finding Exemption 7(e) properly applied to “redacted codes, case numbers, and other computer 18 information” because disclosure “could reasonably be expected to risk circumvention of the law”
• “Congress has expressly prohibited ATF from releasing such documents to the public.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).