Skip to main content

McRae v. State

Citations

  • 88 So. 3d 384
  • 2012 WL 1694627
  • 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 7830

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that revocation of probation based on an uncharged violation deprives the defendant of due process and constitutes fundamental error
  • holding that where the trial court revoked probation based on conduct not alleged in the affidavit, the reversal would be \without prejudice to the State - 11 - proceeding on the original affidavit or filing an appropriate affidavit\
  • holding it was fundamental error to revoke probation on uncharged allegations
  • observing, in another case in which the State conceded error, that “the trial court committed reversible error by failing to specify what condition [the defendant] violated in its order revoking probation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Black, Larose, Silberman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.