Skip to main content
· 12/7/1995

McRae v. Hyman

Citations

  • 667 A.2d 1356
  • 1995 D.C. App. LEXIS 236
  • 1995 WL 717166

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the parole regulations’ “numerical system is not a rigid formula ... because the Board is not required to either grant or deny parole based upon the score attained”
  • holding that the parole regulations' \numerical system is not a rigid formula ... because the Board is not required to either grant or deny parole based upon the score attained\
  • concluding that the 1987 Regulations do not give rise to a liberty interest in parole
  • District’s numerical scoring system does not limit Board’s discretion to grant or deny parole
  • “The District’s parole scheme confers discretion to grant or deny parole[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Steadman, King, Belson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.