MCR FUNDING v. CMG Funding Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming trial court’s money judgment award against a party who failed to comply with a non- contingent settlement term requiring the payment of $150,000.00
• conflicting with 84 Lumber on the issue of when a parly may challenge the court's power to decide the issue of jurisdiction
• \`Case' jurisdiction is the `power of the court over a particular case that is within its subject matter jurisdiction.'\
• “‘Case’ jurisdiction is the ‘power of the court over a particular case that is within its subject matter jurisdiction.’” (quoting T.D. v. K.D., 747 So. 2d 456, 457 n.2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999))
• “‘Case’ jurisdiction is the ‘power of the court over a particular case that is within its subject matter jurisdiction.’” (quoting T.D. v. K.D., 747 So. 2d 456, 457 n.2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999))
• “‘Case’ jurisdiction is the ‘power of the court over a particular case that is within its subject matter jurisdiction.’” (quoting T.D. v. K.D., 747 So. 2d 456, 457 n.2 (Fla. 4th DCA 1999))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).