McQuilken v. Central Pacific Railroad
Citations
- 50 Cal. 7
- 1875 Cal. LEXIS 70
Syllabus
<p>CoNTBiBtrroBV Negligence a Mattes of Defense.—In an action for damages to the person, alleged to have been sustained by carelessness or negligence of the employees of a railroad company, while a passenger on a train, contributory negligence on the part of the plaintiff is a matter of defense to be proved by the defendant.</p> <p>Idem.—The above rule does not prevent the trial court from directing judgment, as in case of nonsuit, if the evidence introduced by the plaintiff conclusively establishes the defense of contributory negligence.</p>
Judges: McKinstry
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.