Skip to main content
· 5/17/1991

McQueen v. Downtown Athletic Club of New York City, Inc.

Citations

  • 763 F. Supp. 61
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 6620
  • 1991 WL 81108

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the FDCPA violation claim was sufficiently pleaded where the plaintiff alleged that a debt collector left a message at the plaintiffs residence and his mother overheard the message
  • explaining that “leaving a message on an answering machine is ‘inherently risky’ because it is well known that, unlike a voicemail message, a message left on an answering machine can be easily heard within a certain distance” (emphasis added)
  • “If violations of the FDCPA required deliberate or purposeful intent, then the bona fide error defense’s ‘not intentional’ element would tend towards surplusage.” (citation and quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mukasey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.