McQuaig v. Tarrant

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a defendant meets its burden on summary judgment by showing that there is insufficient record evidence “to create a jury issue on at least one essential element of plaintiff’s case” (punctuation omitted)
• granting summary judgment where “there [wa]s no evidence of anything [the defendant] could have done to avoid the collision”
• affirming grant of summary judgment to defendant driver when “uncontradicted evidence” showed that plaintiff “drove into [defendant’s] path” and when there was “no evidence of anything [defendant] could have done to avoid the collision”
• affirming grant of summary judgment to defendant driver when “uncontradicted evidence” showed that plaintiff “drove into [defendant’s] path” and when there was “no evidence of anything [defendant] could have done to avoid the collision”
• summary judgment to defendant affirmed where no dispute that, once other driver drove into intersection, collision with defendant’s car became inevitable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).