McPherson v. Zoning Board of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requisite evidence that must be adduced to satisfy the variance requirements involves proof of a rather narrow and somewhat technical set of facts
• holding that the requisite evidence that must be adduced to satisfy the variance requirements involves proof of a rather narrow and somewhat technical set of facts
• finding the applicant had not established deprivation of reasonable use because the record was “devoid of any evidence that the applicant could not make reasonable use of the land or buildings in conformity with the [zoning code] or her pre-existing nonconforming use”
• finding the applicant had not established deprivation of reasonable use because the record was “devoid of any evidence that the applicant could not make reasonable use of the land or buildings in conformity with the [zoning code] or her preexisting nonconforming use”
• “[I]t is questionable if appellee’s violation of the zoning ordinance can constitute a ‘unique’ circumstance as a matter of law.”
• appeal of director’s decision granting a request for variance to enlarge an existing nonconforming use

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).