MCPHERSON, DESEAN LAVERNE v. the State of Texas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that custody for Miranda purposes means \formal arrest or restraint on freedom of movement... associated with formal arrest\
• holding that custody for Miranda purposes means “formal ar rest or restraint on freedom of movement ... associated with formal arrest”
• holding that incriminating statements to probation officer were not compelled despite absence of Miranda warnings
• holding that because the defendant’s disclosures were not .compelled incriminations, he could not invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege
• holding that because the defendant’s disclosures were not compelled incriminations, he could not invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege
• holding that because the defendant’s disclosures were not compelled incriminations, he could not invoke the Fifth Amendment privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).