McPhee v. the Paul Revere Life Ins. Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an erroneous jury instruction constitutes reversible error where the instruction “reasonably might have misled the jury”
• explaining that an erroneous jury instruction constitutes reversible error where the instruction “reasonably might have misled the jury”
• “[T]he test for reversible error arising from an erroneous jury instruction is not whether the instruction misled, but only whether it reasonably might have misled the jury.”
• “[T]he test for reversible error arising from an erroneous jury instruction is not whether the instruction misled, but only whether it reasonably might have misled the jury.”
• “The interpretation of a contract is a question of law to be decided by a court.”
• “[T]he test for reversible error arising from an erroneous jury instruction is not whether the instruction misled, but only whether it reasonably might have misled the jury.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).