Skip to main content
· 3/24/2005

McPeek v. Lockhart

Citations

  • 174 S.W.3d 751
  • 2005 Tenn. App. LEXIS 199
  • 2005 WL 675206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t does not necessarily follow that simply because the injured spouse is found to have a legitimate claim that there then must be loss of consortium for the non-injured spouse.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Judge D. Michael Swiney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.