McNulty v. Taser International Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[t]he sequence [of the U34000] restarts only if you pull the trigger again”
• “Once the five second sequence [of the M-series devices] is finished, the user must repull the trigger to reactivate the charge and it will again run for five seconds.”
• discussing the timing of the discharge sequence for the U34000
• describing the 5-second discharge of the M-series models

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• J.R. Simplot Co. v. Rycair, Inc.
  Idaho Supreme Court· 2003-03-05· cited 6×
• Intex Recreation Corp. v. Metalast, S.A. Sociedad Unipersonal
  District of Columbia· 2003-02-12· cited 2×
• McNulty v. Taser International, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2004-07-07

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1995-04-05· cited 2,940×
• Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co.
  Supreme Court· 1950-10-09· cited 1,620×
• Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.
  Supreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 1,430×
• Festo Corp. v. Shoketsu Kinzoku Kogyo Kabushiki Co.
  Supreme Court· 2002-05-28· cited 669×
• Southwall Technologies, Inc. v. Cardinal Ig Company
  Federal Circuit· 1995-06-21· cited 625×
• Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1989-02-21· cited 612×
• Loom Co. v. Higgins
  Supreme Court· 1882-05-18· cited 569×
• Pennwalt Corporation, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Durand-Wayland, Inc., Appellee/cross-Appellant
  Federal Circuit· 1987-11-06· cited 390×
• Valmont Industries, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Reinke Manufacturing Company, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1993-01-07· cited 174×
• The Perkin-Elmer Corporation v. Westinghouse Electric Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1987-06-24· cited 173×
• Phonometrics, Inc. v. Northern Telecom Inc., and United Telephone Company of Florida, and Sprint Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 1998-02-11· cited 170×
• Unique Concepts, Inc., and Floyd M. Baslow v. Kevin Brown D/B/A Creative Walls, Templar and Schram, and World Plastics Extruders, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1991-07-19· cited 156×
• K-2 Corporation v. Salomon S.A. And Salomon/north America, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-09-13· cited 145×
• Biovail Corporation International, Biovail Laboratories,inc., and Galephar P.R., Inc. Ltd. v. Andrx Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2001-02-13· cited 73×
• Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. And Guidant Sales Corporation v. Scimed Life Systems, Inc. And Boston Scientific Corporation
  Federal Circuit· 2001-08-06· cited 73×
• Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. United States Surgical Corp.
  Federal Circuit· 1996-08-29· cited 47×
• Signtech Usa, Ltd. v. Vutek, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 1999-04-08· cited 42×

Other cases named McNulty v. Taser International Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• McNulty v. Taser International, Inc.
  Federal Circuit· 2004-07-07