McNulty Bros. v. Kennedy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that IEP violated procedural requirements of IDEA where it contained only “generalized proposal of behavioral and educational goals for [student], with minimal details describing how the [proposed, educational program] - would help [student] meet such goal#’
• noting that “goals and objectives to be achieved” must be contained within the IEP
• “[I]t is the district court’s role in the first instance to weigh the equities in this case to determine the appropriate level of reimbursement to be awarded.”
• “The IEP conference is the primary opportunity for parental involvement in the process of developing an IEP.”
• “[T]he Knables’ refusal to agree on a proposed placement for [the disabled child] does not justify [the school district’s] noncompliance with the IDEA. Thus, the only offer of placement that was appropriately before the district court was that specified in [the school district’s] draft IEP.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).