McNesby v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, “[e]ven assuming that trial counsel’s failure to seek the redaction of the video [played for the jury] was deficient, there was no prejudice”
• holding that a mischaracterization of the record will not support a claim of ineffective assistance of counsel
• counsel’s alleged deficiency not prejudicial in light of evidence of guilt

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).