McNelly v. Conde
Citations
- 166 N.E.3d 697
- 2021 Ohio 146
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in finding that a rental agreement existed and that appellant breached the agreement by failing to provide a habitable premises. In addition, the court correctly found that a subsequent agreement lacked consideration due to appellant's breach of the original contract. Due to the allegations of fraud and the need to consider facts relating to habitability, the trial court also did not err in admitting parol evidence. The damages award was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Welbaum
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.