Skip to main content
· 1/22/2021

McNelly v. Conde

Citations

  • 166 N.E.3d 697
  • 2021 Ohio 146

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in finding that a rental agreement existed and that appellant breached the agreement by failing to provide a habitable premises. In addition, the court correctly found that a subsequent agreement lacked consideration due to appellant's breach of the original contract. Due to the allegations of fraud and the need to consider facts relating to habitability, the trial court also did not err in admitting parol evidence. The damages award was not against the manifest weight of the evidence. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.