McNeill v. Town of Islip

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• board must have \explicit and objectively adequate reason\ to reject uncontradicted evidence [citation omitted]
• agency's decision will be upheld if it \could have been made by reference to the logic of experience\ [emphasis in original]
• agency’s decision will be upheld if it “could have been made by reference to the logic of experience” [emphasis in original]
• board must credit proponent’s evidence if “logically adequate, and . . . neither contradicted nor improbable”
• board of assessors may not reject unrebutted and corroborated testimony “without a basis for such rejection in the record”
• where there is uncontradicted expert testimony on subject beyond common knowledge and experience of fact finder, agency may not reject that testimony without providing basis for rejection in record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).