· 8/22/2006
McNeil v. Wyeth
Citations
- 462 F.3d 364
- 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21499
- 2006 WL 2411547
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that significant difference between percentages given in warning and actual percentages raises fact issue for jury
- “Texas law generally holds that the adequacy of a product’s warning is a question of fact to be determined by the jury
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King, Smith, Benavides
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.