McNeil v. Wyeth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that significant difference between percentages given in warning and actual percentages raises fact issue for jury
• “Texas law generally holds that the adequacy of a product’s warning is a question of fact to be determined by the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Knight v. Kirby Inland Marine Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2007-04-05· cited 625×
• PLIVA, Inc. v. Mensing
  Supreme Court· 2011-06-23· cited 428×
• Christopher v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. (In Re Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Pinnacle Hip Implant Prod. Liab. Litig.)
  Fifth Circuit· 2018-04-25· cited 156×
• Wendy Collini, M.D. v. Martha Pustejovsky
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-02-12· cited 63×
• Ackermann v. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
  Fifth Circuit· 2008-04-24· cited 53×
• Centocor, Inc. v. Hamilton
  Texas Supreme Court· 2012-06-08· cited 43×
• Rimbert v. Eli Lilly and Co.
  D. New Mexico· 2008-08-22· cited 37×
• Pustejovsky v. Pliva, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 2010-10-08· cited 34×
• Good v. Altria Group, Inc.
  First Circuit· 2007-08-31· cited 30×
• Shirley Brinkley v. Pliva, Inc.
  Eighth Circuit· 2014-12-02· cited 28×
• In Re Reglan Litigation
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2016-08-22· cited 24×
• Knipe v. Smithkline Beecham
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2008-09-30· cited 21×
• Bee v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
  E.D. New York· 2014-05-09· cited 20×
• Murthy v. Abbott Laboratories
  S.D. Texas· 2012-03-06· cited 18×
• Kubicki ex rel. Kubicki v. Medtronic, Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2018-02-05· cited 14×
• Gonzalez v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  S.D. Texas· 2013-03-12· cited 14×
• Giles v. Wyeth, Inc.
  S.D. Illinois· 2007-06-20· cited 13×
• McKay v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.
  W.D. Texas· 2013-03-28· cited 12×
• In Re Avandia Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2011-09-07· cited 9×
• Vaughan v. Nielson
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2008-08-27· cited 7×

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1986-06-25· cited 135,235×
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
• Mary Faye Skotak, George Jerry Skotak, and Eric Norman Skotak, Cross-Appellees v. Tenneco Resins, Inc., Cross-Appellant
  Fifth Circuit· 1992-03-26· cited 898×
• Alm v. Aluminum Co. of America
  Texas Supreme Court· 1986-07-02· cited 428×
• Nobility Homes of Texas, Inc. v. Shivers
  Texas Supreme Court· 1977-10-05· cited 256×
• Lenger v. Physician's General Hospital, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1970-06-10· cited 233×
• Bristol-Myers Co. v. Gonzales
  Texas Supreme Court· 1978-02-01· cited 164×
• Crocker v. Winthrop Laboratories, Division of Sterling Drug, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1974-10-02· cited 90×
• Gravis v. Parke-Davis & Co.
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1973-11-15· cited 61×
• Patricia W. Salmon, Guardian Ad Litem of Timothy B. Salmon, a Minor v. Parke, Davis and Company
  Fourth Circuit· 1975-08-11· cited 60×
• Porterfield v. Ethicon, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1999-08-18· cited 59×
• Rolen v. Burroughs Wellcome Co.
  Tex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 1993-06-16· cited 40×
• Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories Co. v. Medrano
  Tex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-08-07· cited 38×
• Windham v. Wyeth Laboratories, Inc.
  S.D. Mississippi· 1992-02-14· cited 34×
• Stewart v. Janssen Pharmaceutica, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 8th Dist. (El Paso)· 1989-12-13· cited 31×
• Jordan v. Geigy Pharmaceuticals
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1993-03-31· cited 27×
• Rodriguez v. Reeves
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1987-03-12· cited 23×
• Williams v. Upjohn Co.
  S.D. Texas· 1994-02-13· cited 8×

Other cases named McNeil v. Wyeth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• McNeil v. Wyeth
  Fifth Circuit· 2007-02-13