Skip to main content
· 8/22/2006

McNeil v. Wyeth

Citations

  • 462 F.3d 364
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 21499
  • 2006 WL 2411547

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that significant difference between percentages given in warning and actual percentages raises fact issue for jury
  • “Texas law generally holds that the adequacy of a product’s warning is a question of fact to be determined by the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King, Smith, Benavides

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.