McNeil v. Blum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the court acted reasonably when considering Petitioner’s mental conditions when it concluded that they did not justify a variance below the guideline range
• finding that the government’s conduct in the investigation as not obviously outrageous
• rejecting a criminal appellant’s arguments that did not directly challenge the district court’s reasoning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).