Skip to main content
· 12/8/1925

McNeil & Higgins Co. v. Howell

Citations

  • 10 F.2d 969
  • 1925 U.S. App. LEXIS 2299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the loss of a job is “quintessentially reparable by money damages”
  • holding that the loss of a job is “quintessentially reparable by money damages”
  • finding no irreparable harm and denying injunctive relief because “[t]he loss of a job is quintessentially reparable by money damages”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Alschuler, Andeeson, Chulee

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.