Skip to main content
· 3/24/1977

McNeece v. McNeece

Citations

  • 562 P.2d 767
  • 39 Colo. App. 160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying res judicata to the presumed father’s attempt to challenge paternity would lead to an unjust result
  • presumed father barred by res judicata and estoppel of judgments from raising paternity as a defense in a child support action
  • presumed father barred by res judicata and estoppel of judgments from raising paternity as a defense in a child support action
  • ex-husband's \newly discovered evidence\ of nonpaternity was too late for relief from judgment or other equitable remedy, when he learned of such evidence within days of entry of divorce decree but waited five years to raise nonpaternity issue
  • ex-husband’s “newly discovered evidence” of nonpaternity was too late for relief from judgment or other equitable remedy, when he learned of such evidence within days of entry of divorce decree but waited five years to raise nonpaternity issue
  • issue of paternity raised in divorce proceeding between husband and wife is res judicata in later proceeding between spouses, but child who was not a party to the divorce action could not be bound by paternity determination in divorce action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Enoch

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.