McNamara v. Cerf

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Wright “does not forbid recourse to other evidence that confirms the presumptive unreliability of the hearsay”
• holding that Wright “does not forbid recourse to other evidence that confirms the presumptive unreliability of the hearsay”
• for almost a month preceding the interview, the child declarant had been interviewed repeatedly concerning the alleged sexual abuse
• Supreme Court's analysis of guarantees of trustworthiness prong in Wright applied existing precedents rather than create a new rule
• for almost a month preceding the interview, the child declarant had been interviewed repeatedly concerning the alleged sexual abuse
• a precise statement to a stranger \invites reflection on what had prepared [the child] to be so candid\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).