McNall v. Frus

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “non-testimonial acts performed outside the courtroom have been protected in Illinois”
• circuit court did not abuse its discretion where the proposed amendment simply restated the allegations in the original complaint
• testimony of social worker as expert retained by husband in a child custody proceeding
• defendant immune from suit of negligence by absolute litigation privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).