McMurrough v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding State’s argument that insinuated Appellant’s counsel improperly invented Appellant’s defense was improper because it was not based on evidence and it constituted an outside-the-record attack on defense counsel’s integrity
• holding State’s argument that insinuated Appellant’s counsel improperly invented Appellant’s defense was improper because it was not based on evidence and it constituted an outside-the-record attack on defense counsel’s integrity
• holding State’s argument that insinuated Appellant’s counsel improperly invented Appellant’s defense was improper because it was not based on evidence and it constituted an outside-the-record attack on defense counsel’s integrity

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).