Skip to main content
· 2/20/1922

McMullin v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

Citations

  • 273 Pa. 159
  • 116 A. 832
  • 1922 Pa. LEXIS 539

Syllabus

<p>Negligence — Street railways — Failure to protect passenger attached by fellow passenger — Evidence—Carlisle tables — Harmless error.</p> <p>1. Under the evidence in this ease the question whether a conductor had failed in his duty to guard a passenger attacked by another passenger, was left to the jury, and a judgment on a verdict for defendant was sustained.</p> <p>2. The refusal in a negligence case to admit in evidence the Carlisle tables, is not ground for reversal, where the verdict was for the defendant.</p>

Judges: Frazer, Moschzisker, Sadler, Schaffer, Simpson, Walling

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.