McMullen v. Kutz

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court will read this reasonableness requirement into a contract with an attorneys' fees provision that lacks an explicit directive that such fees be reasonable
• court will read this reasonableness requirement into a contract with an attorneys' fees provision that lacks an explicit directive that such fees be reasonable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McMullen v. Kutz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2009-12-28· cited 127×
• Mazurek v. Russell
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2014-06-24· cited 27×
• Faulkner v. M & T Bank (In re Faulkner)
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 2018-10-03· cited 9×
• Township of Millcreek v. A. Cres Trust of June 25, 1998
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-11-25

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• LaRocca Estate
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1968-10-03· cited 157×
• Atlantic Contracting & Material Co. v. Ulico Casualty Co.
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2004-03-12· cited 89×
• Creeks v. Creeks
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1993-01-19· cited 45×
• Glynn v. Glynn
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-12-17· cited 37×
• Duffy v. Gerst
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1981-05-01· cited 30×
• Rauch v. McCall
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-06· cited 30×
• McMahon v. McMahon
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-01-20· cited 26×
• Estate of Murray v. Love
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-01-31· cited 21×