McMillin v. Union Electric Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that question about workers’ compensation was permissible when asked in context of all types of personal-injury claims
• explaining that when the word \insurance\ is not explicitly mentioned, it is speculative to conclude the jury inferred the defendant had liability insurance
• question about workers’ compensation in context of claims in general provided no indication of having been “designed to inject insurance into the case” or having been “asked in bad faith”
• plaintiff inquired whether any panel member had ever filed a worker’s compensation claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).