Skip to main content
· 1/6/1972

McMillin v. Great Southern Corporation

Citations

  • 480 S.W.2d 152
  • 63 Tenn. App. 732
  • 1972 Tenn. App. LEXIS 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • parol evidence may be used to contradict or vary the terms of a written instrument upon a showing of fraud or mutual mistake
  • option agreement's silence as to whether the optionee must be an employee or officer at the time of exercise did not create ambiguiiy allowing for the consideration of parol evidence
  • option agreement’s silence as to whether the optionee must be an employee or officer at the time of exercise did not create ambiguity allowing for the consideration of parol evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Nearn, Carney, Matherne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.