McMillan v. Wiley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding defendants were entitled to qualified immunity because “Plaintiff fails to state a plausible claim that his confinement at ADX interferes with a liberty interest or that he was deprived of a sufficient level of procedural due process”
• finding annual reviews of prisoners’ placement at the ADX satisfied DiMarco’s due process requirements
• denying the plaintiff’s untimely motion to amend based upon the appearance of new counsel because “the addition of counsel generally does not amount to good cause under the standard set out in [Rule 16(b)(4)]”
• finding BOP security classifications for different facilities are unreviewable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).