McMillan v. Osborne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• striking class allegations for failing to comply with the Local Rules’ requirement that such motions be filed within ninety days of filing of the complaint
• noting that if the deadline ran from the filing of a state court complaint, \state court plaintiffs who sought to maintain class actions would be required to anticipate removal and to begin calculating deadlines under rules which do not apply to state actions\
• noting that if the deadline ran from the filing of a state court complaint, “state court plaintiffs who sought to maintain class actions would be required to anticipate removal and to begin calculating deadlines under rules which do not apply to state actions”
• district court denied class certification as untimely under Local Rule’s 90 day time period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).