McMillan v. Computer Translation Systems & Support, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding non-signatory defendants, who were sued separately from signatory defendants on same claims, could enforce arbitration agreement under this equitable exception; further, non-signatory defendants were undisputedly agents or servants of signatory defendants
• holding non-signatory defendants, who were sued separately from signatory defendants on same claims, could enforce arbitration agreement under this equitable exception; further, non-signatory defendants were undisputedly agents or servants of signatory defendants
• agents’ allegedly wrongful acts related to behavior as agents and those acts were within scope of claims covered by arbitration provision for which principal would be liable
• “Application of equitable estoppel is warranted when the signatory to the contract containing an arbitration clause raises allegations of substantially interdependent and concerted misconduct by both the nonsignatory and one or more of the signatories to the contract.”
• non-signatories were employees or agents of signatory
• non-signatories were employees or agents of signatory

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).