McMATH v. CITY OF GARY, INDIANA

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that plaintiffs had stated a claim for a liberty interest because “there is a nexus between the firing—the loss of current employment—and the publication sufficient to implicate a liberty interest cognizable under Siegert and prior case law”
• dissemination within the chain of command does not qualify as publication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).