McManus v. Fleetwood Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court abused its discretion by certifying (b)(2) class where, as here, ordinary relief for lawsuit would be money damages
• holding that trial court abused its discretion by certifying (b)(2) class where, as here, ordinary relief for lawsuit would be money damages
• concluding that the factual basis of plaintiffs’ suit was “markedly different from the paradigm Rule 23(b)(2) class action,” and thus class certification under Rule 23(b)(2) was inappropriate
• concluding the district court abused its discretion in finding questions of fact common to the class were predominant under Rule 23(b)(3) with respect to the named plaintiffs’ claims for fraudulent inducement and negligent misrepresentation
• stating that the implied warranty of merchantability is a contractual “cause of action D. Consumer-Protection Claims Plaintiffs also bring statutory consumer-protection claims under California (UCL and CLRA, Counts V and VIII), Nevada (NDPTA, Count VII
• involving manifested defect C motor homes required supplemental brakes to safely tow 3,500 pounds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).