McMahon v. Alternative Claims Service, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• permitting potential punitive damages recovery for intentional infliction of emotional distress tort tied to breach of contract claim
• adopting majority view that a “ ‘court should not consider the value of a defendant’s compulsory counterclaim in determining the amount in controversy for removal jurisdiction’ ”
• “[T]his District has endorsed the majority view that a court should not consider the value of a defendant’s compulsory counterclaim in determining the amount in controversy for removal jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).