McMahan v. Boardman

Citations

• 29 Tex. 170

Syllabus

<p>The court did not notice the objection that the writ did not run in the name of the State, when the county, stated as venue, could be treated as surplus-age. (Const. of State, Art. IV, sec. 9, Paschal’s Dig., p. 57, Note 181.)</p> <p>When the affidavits for attachment state all which the statute requires, it would be too refined to say that an immaterial additional fact is too much. (Paschal’s Dig., Arts. 138, 142, Notes 257, 259.)</p>