MCM Mgt. Corp. v. L&T Equip. Parts, L.L.C.
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 3108
Syllabus
Equipment broker breached contract by failing to deliver specific track frames depicted in photographs that induced buyer's agreement to purchase. Jury verdict finding no breach was against manifest weight of evidence where broker admitted delivered goods differed from those shown in inducing photographs. Photographic representations used to induce contract formation establish what parties bargained for and do not violate parol evidence rule. Trial court did not abuse discretion in excluding CFO's lay opinion testimony regarding reasonableness of equipment repair costs and percentage impact on project costs where testimony required specialized analytical conclusions beyond witness's personal knowledge under Evid.R. 701.
Judges: Hendrickson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.