Skip to main content
· 11/30/1903

McLoughlin v. Raphael Tuck Co.

Citations

  • 191 U.S. 267
  • 24 S. Ct. 105
  • 48 L. Ed. 178
  • 1903 U.S. LEXIS 1449

Syllabus

<p>The penal provisions of § 4693, R. S., as amended by the act of March 3,1891, had no extraterritorial operation and did not embrace the act of affixing in a foreign country to a publication, a false statement that it was copyrighted under the laws of the United States.</p> <p>Prior to the amendment of March 3, 1897, there was no provision in the copyright laws forbidding the importation into, or the sale after its importation within, the United States of an article falsely stamped with the copyright notice in a foreign country and the proviso in the amending act expressly saved the right to sell such an article if it had been imported prior thereto':</p>

Judges: White, Holmes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.