McLernon v. Dynegy, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Forest Oil considerations are “ ‘facts ... that guide[ ] our reasoning1 and ‘factors’-not elements that all must be established”
• noting that Forest Oil considerations are “‘facts . . . that guide[ ] our reasoning’ and ‘factors’—not elements that all must be established”
• analyzing affidavits and statements of payments summarizing principal payments required and payments made in deciding whether plaintiff met balance “due and owing” element when collecting on promissory note
• “[A] written instrument reciting a consideration imports one, and with such a recitation we presume the consideration [to be] sufficient.”
• “[A] written instrument reciting a consideration imports one, and with such a recitation we presume the consideration [to be] sufficient.”
• “The inquiry under this guideline cannot be whether they discussed the fraudulent-inducement claim or whether he was aware of the misrepresentations at issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).