McLeod v. Select Specialty Hosp. Ne. Ohio, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a district court’s “post-dismissal actions cannot confer upon the court ancillary jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement”
• explaining that motion to enforce settlement agreement is \fundamentally a claim for breach of a contract\
• finding that in order to retain jurisdiction to enforce a settlement agreement, a district court must either expressly retain jurisdiction over the settlement agreement or incorporate the terms of the agreement in an order of dismissal
• finding that a federal court will retain ancillary jurisdiction to enforce a settlement only where it has (1) expressly retained jurisdiction over enforcement of the agreement, or (2)incorporated the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement in a court order
• finding that a federal court will retain ancillary jurisdiction to enforce a settlement only where it has (1) expressly retained jurisdiction over enforcement of the agreement, or (2)incorporated the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement in a court order
• finding that a federal court will retain ancillary jurisdiction to enforce a settlement only where it has (1) expressly retained jurisdiction over enforcement of the agreement, or (2) incorporated the terms of the parties’ settlement agreement in a court order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).