McLeod v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting the back is “a much more complicated area of the body,” which requires “a higher degree of expertise than was presented to determine the degree of ... loss of use”
• review by appellate courts of relationship of employment is governed by preponderance of evidence
• \No award under the Workers' Compensation Law is authorized unless the employer-employee or master-servant relationship existed at the time of the alleged injury for which claim is made.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).