Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1/5/1987
McLeod v. McLeod
Citations
- 723 S.W.2d 777
- 1987 Tex. App. LEXIS 6479
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- prohibiting examination of extraneous material where language of court's order is plain
- prohibiting examination of extraneous material where language of court’s order is plain
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Guittard, McClung, James
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- In the Interest of E.A.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2005-05-11· cited 41×
- In the Interest of A.L.H.C.Court of Appeals of Texas· 2001-07-12· cited 35×
- State ex rel. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2011-04-01· cited 33×
- Freightliner Corp. v. Motor Vehicle Board of Texas Department of TransportationTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-05-01· cited 31×
- Azbill v. Dallas County Child Protective Services Unit of the Texas Department of Human & Regulatory ServicesCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1993-06-22· cited 17×
- Payless Cashways, Inc. v. HillTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2004-08-03· cited 14×
- McLeod v. McLeodCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1988-05-26· cited 3×
- STATE EX REL. STATE FARM MUT. v. BedellWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2011-07-22· cited 2×
- In Re ALHCTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2001-07-12
- Azbill v. DALLAS CTY. CHILD PROT. SERV.Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1993-06-22
- In Re EACTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2005-05-11
- Freightliner Corporation and Ford Motor Company v. Motor Vehicle Board of the Texas Department of Transportation and Metro Ford Truck Sales, Inc.Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2008-05-01
- in the Estate of Frances Anderton BuchananTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2020-11-19
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Lone Star Cement Corporation v. FairTexas Supreme Court· 1971-05-05· cited 190×
- Wiggin v. Knights of PythiasU.S. Circuit Court· 1887-06-18· cited 11×
- In the Interest of Kates v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1977-10-04· cited 8×
- Harrell v. HarrellDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1965-01-26· cited 7×
- Martin v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1975-04-24· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.