McLeod v. Baptiste

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a restrictive covenant that was personal to the grant- or may not be enforced against a remote grantee when the grantor owns no real property which would benefit from enforcing the covenant
• finding that the original grantor lacks standing to enforce a covenant against a remote grantee when the grantor no longer owns real property which would benefit from the enforcement of that restrictive covenant
• original covenantee lacked standing to enforce architectural design covenants because it no longer owned any real property that would benefit from the covenants enforcement
• original covenantee lacked standing to enforce architectural design covenants because it no longer owned any real property that would benefit from the covenants enforcement
• “[A] grantor lacks standing to enforce a covenant against a remote grantee when the grantor no longer owns real property which would benefit from the enforcement of that restrictive covenant.” (emphasis added) (citation omitted)
• \[A] grantor lacks standing to enforce a covenant against a remote grantee when the grantor no longer owns real property which would benefit from the enforcement of that restrictive covenant.\ (emphasis added) (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).