McLaury v. United States Postal Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Having 6]} “no trouble concluding that compliance with the AKS is a ‘material’ 7! condition of payment,” even while “[p]utting aside the question of 8]} whether [PPACA] has a bearing on interpretation of the interplay □ □□ between the AKS and the FCA before March 23, 2010.”
• reversed on other grounds, 899 F.3d 163 (2d 23] Cir. 2018)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).