McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents for Higher Education

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a state sponsored graduate school’s disparate treatment of an admitted black student based on his race violated the Equal Protection Clause
• citing, inter alia, DiStiso v. Cook, 691 F.3d 226, 240 (2d Cir. 2012)
• “It is said that the separations imposed by the State in this case are in form merely nominal. . . . But they signify that the State . . . sets [petitioner] apart from the other students.”
• “It is said that the separations imposed by the State in this case are in form merely nominal. . . . But they signify that the State . . . sets [petitioner] apart from the other stu- dents.”
• finding this right clearly established by McLaurin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).