Skip to main content
· 4/27/2000

McLaurin v. Apfel

Citations

  • 95 F. Supp. 2d 111
  • 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10531
  • 2000 WL 554252

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff’s position against 14 remand was not reasonable when the plaintiff “should have recognized that the conflicting 15 evidence clearly warranted remand”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ross

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.