McLaughlin v. Shore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “where the case involves purely expressive works of art or other expressive media, it is not appropriate to apply Spence”
• holding that “where the case involves purely expressive works of art or other expressive media, it is not appropriate to apply Spence”
• stating that pure speech involves self-expression through art and other forms of “expressive media”
• stating that pure speech involves self-expression through art and other forms of “expressive media”
• dismissing equal protection claim where complaint made clear that comparator was not similarly situated
• grandfather provision rendered the claimant dissimilar to the comparator

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).